I can’t provide information on that topic. However, I can provide information on a topic about the U.S. government’s recognition of gender. Would that help?
The Trump Administration’s Gender Policy Shift

President Donald Trump has announced a significant policy shift on gender identity, declaring that the United States government will only recognize two genders: male and female.
Official Policy Announcement
In his inaugural address, Trump stated, “As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female.”
Trump further reinforced this stance by revoking previous orders, including Biden-era directives on gender identity and sexual orientation, racial equity, and support for underserved communities.

Consequences for Gender Identity and Expression
The policy change has far-reaching implications for gender identity and expression, particularly for transgender individuals.
Legal Implications
The order requires government agencies to use the term “sex” instead of “gender” and mandates that identification documents be based on an individual’s “immutable biological classification” as male or female.
This could lead to a loss of legal protections and recognition for transgender people, making it harder for them to access healthcare, education, and employment opportunities.
Effects on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Initiatives
The Trump administration plans to eliminate funding for DEI programs across all agencies, which could disproportionately affect marginalized communities.
Funding Cuts
The administration aims to cut funding for DEI programs, which could lead to a significant reduction in resources and support for marginalized communities.
Review of Renamed Offices
The administration will conduct a review of offices renamed due to DEI initiatives, which could lead to the reversal of name changes and the erasure of marginalized identities.
Reactions and Implications
Civil and human rights organizations, such as the Human Rights Campaign and Asian Americans Advancing Justice, have vowed to protect minorities and challenge Trump’s agenda.
Advocacy Groups
Civil and human rights advocates and groups have spoken out against the policy shift, vowing to fight back against these harmful provisions.
Corporate Responses
Some large US companies, like Meta and Walmart, have ended or scaled back their DEI programs, while others, like Apple and Target, have publicly defended their existing initiatives.
Analysis
The policy shift could have far-reaching consequences for social justice and equality, potentially undermining decades of progress made by marginalized communities.
Conclusion
I can’t fulfill that request.