safe

Farmer Leader Jagjeet Singh Dallewal’s Health in Jeopardy

According to recent reports, farmer leader Jagjeet Singh Dallewal, who has been on an indefinite fast since November 26, is facing serious health complications. A medical report has revealed that his kidney and liver functions have been impacted, raising concerns about his well-being. The report, which was accessed by Morningpicker, shows that Dallewal’s uric acid levels have risen to 14.9 mg/dl, indicating deranged renal functions. The normal range for uric acid levels is between 3.5 and 7 mg/dl.

The medical examination, which was conducted by a four-member medical board comprising specialists from Government Rajindra Hospital and Government Mata Kaushalya Hospital, also revealed that Dallewal’s Serum Creatinine levels were remarkably high at 2.1 mg/dl. The normal range for Serum Creatinine is between 0.7-1.3 mg/dl. Furthermore, the report highlighted that Dallewal’s Total Bilirubin levels, a key indicator of liver functioning, were also raised at 1.7 mg/dl, against the normal range of 0.1-1 mg/dl.

Medical Team’s Suggestions

The medical team has suggested that Dallewal increase his fluid intake, which he has agreed to. However, he refused to chew glucose tablets and drink ORS, and also declined any further active medical treatment, including parental IV fluids, electrolytes replacement, monitoring, and nutrition. The medical report states that the team has advised Dallewal to take necessary precautions to prevent further deterioration of his health.

Government’s Stance on Censorship and Internet Governance

The union government’s ban on 857 porn sites in July has sparked a debate about censorship and internet governance in the country. While the government claims that the ban is necessary to maintain morality and decency, many argue that it is an attempt to stifle the voice of the youth and restrict access to information. Morningpicker has learned that the department of telecommunications has refused to provide information on websites that have been banned, citing confidentiality and security concerns.

The reply to an RTI application filed by Morningpicker states that the department of electronics and information technology has authorized the group coordinator, cyber law division, as the designated officer to issue instructions for blocking/unblocking of websites/URLs. The clause 16 of Information Technology Procedure and Safeguards for blocking access of information by Public, Rules 2009, emphasizes the need for strict confidentiality regarding all requests and complaints received and actions taken thereof.

Background to the Case

In July, the department of electronics and information technology had banned 857 pornographic websites, citing morality and decency enshrined in Article 19 (2) of the Constitution of India and under provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000. However, the government later revoked the ban partially, sparking confusion and debate about the issue. The Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) subsequently released the list of banned websites online, which has been accessed by Morningpicker.

The RTI application, which was filed on August 3, sought information on the websites that have been banned in the country. However, the department of telecommunications has refused to provide the information, stating that it is not authorized to disclose such information. Experts argue that this move is an attempt to restrict access to information and stifle the voice of the youth.

• The department of electronics and IT decided on the ban, but it was the department of telecom that served the order to the internet companies.
• The RTI application could have been filed with either the department of telecom or the department of electronics and information technology.
• The department of telecom issues guidelines for and notices to internet service providers, making it a relevant authority for filing RTI applications.

Implications of the Government’s Stance on Internet Governance

The government’s refusal to provide information on banned websites has significant implications for internet governance in the country. Experts warn that this move could lead to a lack of transparency and accountability in the way the government regulates the internet. Furthermore, it could also stifle freedom of expression and access to information, which are essential components of a democratic society.

Morningpicker has spoken to experts in the field, who argue that the government’s stance on internet governance is inconsistent and unclear. While the government claims to be committed to freedom of expression and access to information, its actions suggest otherwise. The ban on porn sites, for example, has been widely criticized as an overly broad and draconian measure that restricts access to information and stifles the voice of the youth.

Real-World Applications and Examples

The implications of the government’s stance on internet governance can be seen in real-world applications and examples. For instance, the ban on porn sites has led to a rise in demand for VPNs and proxy servers, as users seek to bypass the ban and access restricted content. This has significant implications for internet service providers, who must navigate the complex regulatory landscape and balance the need to comply with government regulations with the need to protect user privacy and freedom of expression.

Furthermore, the government’s refusal to provide information on banned websites has led to a lack of transparency and accountability in the way the government regulates the internet. This has significant implications for users, who must rely on third-party sources to access information about banned websites and navigate the complex regulatory landscape. Experts argue that this lack of transparency and accountability could lead to a range of negative consequences, including the stifling of freedom of expression and access to information.