## Hollywood’s Biggest Feud Just Got Real: SAG’s Sharp Words Could Crash the Oscar Party
The entertainment world is buzzing, not with whispers of who will win Best Picture, but with the shockwaves of a scathing critique. The Screen Actors Guild (SAG) just threw some serious shade at two of Hollywood’s biggest names: Angelina Jolie and Nicole Kidman.
The Shocking SAG Omissions
The recent Screen Actors Guild (SAG) nominations sent shockwaves through Hollywood, with two major contenders for the Oscar for Best Actress notably absent: Nicole Kidman for her performance in “Babygirl” and Angelina Jolie for her portrayal of Maria Callas in “Maria.” Both actresses had garnered significant critical acclaim and were considered frontrunners in the race for the coveted award.
Kidman’s role in “Babygirl,” a film that explores the complex dynamic between a powerful CEO and her significantly younger intern, has been lauded for its nuanced performance and captivating intensity. Jolie, meanwhile, has been celebrated for her transformative performance as the legendary opera singer Maria Callas in “Maria,” a film that delves into the complexities of her life and career.
The exclusion of both actresses from the SAG nominations raises serious questions about their chances at the Oscars. SAG awards carry significant weight in the Academy Awards race, as actors make up the largest voting bloc within the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Historically, the vast majority of Oscar winners for Best Actress have also received a SAG nomination.
Historical Context
A notable exception to this trend is Kate Winslet’s win for “The Reader” in 2009. Although she wasn’t nominated for a SAG Award that year for “The Reader,” she had received a nomination for her performance in “Revolutionary Road.” This unique case highlights the possibility of an Oscar win without a SAG nod, but it remains a rare occurrence.
The Implications for Oscar Night
The SAG snubs have undoubtedly dealt a blow to the Oscar aspirations of both Kidman and Jolie. Winning an Oscar without a SAG nomination is highly improbable, given the importance of the actors’ vote within the Academy.
While it’s not entirely impossible, the odds are significantly stacked against them. The absence of a SAG nomination can also impact the momentum of their Oscar campaigns.
Shrinking Chances
Statistical analysis suggests that the chances of Kidman and Jolie winning the Oscar have significantly diminished. The correlation between SAG nominations and Oscar wins for Best Actress is statistically strong.
While there have been exceptions, the historical data overwhelmingly points to SAG nominations as a crucial indicator of Oscar success in this category.
Potential for Upsets
The SAG snubs could potentially create an opening for other contenders in the Best Actress race.
With Kidman and Jolie’s campaigns facing an uphill battle, other actresses who received SAG nominations, such as Demi Moore, Cynthia Erivo, Mikey Madison, Pamela Anderson, and Karla Sofía Gascón, could emerge as frontrunners.
The SAG nominations have shifted the landscape of the race, making it more competitive and unpredictable.
Beyond the Snubs: Other SAG Surprises
The SAG nominations weren’t just surprising for the omissions of Kidman and Jolie. The Golden Globe-winning film “The Brutalist” was also notably absent from the outstanding ensemble category, despite its critical acclaim and impressive cast.
“The Brutalist” Disappointment
“The Brutalist” has been lauded for its ambitious storytelling, complex characters, and exceptional performances, particularly from Adrien Brody, who received a SAG nomination for his lead role. The film’s exclusion from the ensemble category suggests a potential lack of momentum for its Oscar campaign.
New Contenders
The SAG nominations revealed several new contenders who have emerged as potential dark horses for the Oscars. “A Complete Unknown,” “Anora,” “Conclave,” “Emilia Perez,” and “Wicked” all received nods for outstanding ensemble, highlighting the strong performances and buzz surrounding these films.
SAG’s Impact on Awards Season
The SAG Awards serve as a crucial milestone in the awards season, often providing valuable insights into the trajectory of the race for the Oscars.
Shifting Momentum
The nominations can significantly influence campaign strategies and public perception. The omission of Kidman and Jolie from the SAG nominations has undoubtedly shaken the foundation of their campaigns, while the inclusion of other contenders has shifted the momentum in their favor.
Filmmakers and studios may adjust their promotional efforts based on the SAG results, focusing on films and performances that have garnered recognition from the actors’ guild.
Early Indicators
While the SAG Awards are not definitive predictors of Oscar wins, they often provide early indicators of potential frontrunners. The nominations serve as a barometer of critical and industry support, highlighting films and performances that are resonating with a wide audience.
Conclusion
The New York Post’s explosive article throws a wrench into the already unpredictable Oscar race, exposing a brewing conflict between SAG and Hollywood’s A-list. By calling out Angelina Jolie and Nicole Kidman’s alleged influence on the union’s decisions, the Post suggests a dangerous level of internal division within the organization that could have far-reaching consequences. If the allegations hold water, this feud could not only fracture SAG’s unity but also deeply impact the Oscars. Will this backstage drama translate to front-row boycotts or a lack of enthusiasm from members nominated for prestigious awards? The potential for a boycott, even a subtle one, could significantly alter the dynamics of the ceremony, leaving Hollywood scrambling to maintain its usual glamour and prestige. Ultimately, the impact of this conflict remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the battle lines are drawn, and the stakes are higher than ever. Will this be the year Hollywood’s hypocrisy is exposed on the biggest stage of them all?